BEIRUT, LEBANON (2:00 P.M.) – The Russian Navy is expected to be the first nation in the world to arm their submarines with hypersonic cruise missiles, the Navy Recognition website reported on Tuesday.

According to the online publication, the Russians are expected to arm their submarines with the Zircon model hypersonic missiles, which are believed to give their navy an some strategic advantages in naval warfare.

“The greater speed will better enable Russia to strike time-critical targets and will increase the missile’s survival rate against modern air defences,” the publication said.

“Zircon can reportedly fly at Mach 8 with some estimates being even higher. For comparison, the Tomahawk cruise missiles carried by US Navy and Royal Navy submarines fly at around Mach 0.75,” they continued.

The Syrian War would witness the first time that the Russian Navy used their submarines to fire cruise missiles in combat.

 

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    1
    Share
ALSO READ  US F-16 jet crashes in southwest Germany

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

1 COMMENT

  1. Eventually useful against static targets : against a moving one, except if there is a tactical nuke, at such speed, any very slight correction of trajectory means you miss by several hundred metres…
    And these are not more difficult to intercept than a Scud or Iskander which both are also hypersonic, in fact, Kh-47 Khinzal is an air-launched Iskander. You better just be careful as these would arrive very fast, so rapid reaction is the key.
    Even if Zircon can be installed in Russian VLS, it takes the room of 4 Kalibr and Kalibr are actually not cheap at all, in fact, they’re 3-4x more expensive than a Tomahawk, so expect Zircon to be freaking expensive, if it ends really introduced :
    Let’s be clear, it’s not without reasons US didn’t weaponised X-43 or X-51, or that, in 1961-62, they gave up with AGM-48 SkyBolt which had better performance than Kh-47 Khinzal, same for the infamous Project Pluto trashed in early 60’s too, which 9M730 Burevestnik is inspired from.
    Moreover, remember that at such speeds, you can compare it to an atmospheric re-entry : you create plasma making most of sensors and remote control useless.
    As it’s easy to state that Russia is rationalising equipments, it seems pretty odd, especially that it’d be feasible to adapt Iskander in the same VLS ‘silos’.
    Maybe Zircon will come, maybe not, but I feel a bias to push an arms race while Russia would actually dilapidate nothing.